Opportunities
IDC predicts that the Asia/Pacific call center services market will
grow from US$1.2 billion in 2000 to exceed US$4 billion in 2005. Due
to the rapid expansion of the Indian market and the expected boom in
the Chinese market, India, Australia and China look set to dominate
the market by 2005 (25% CAGR)
Call Center Economy
Economically feasible size and ideal location of call centers
Most Indian companies begin with 100-seat call centers.
A call center may be economically feasible at anywhere between 10 seats
to over 250 seats in size, depending on expected traffic and customer
service objectives of the company concerned. The industry rule-of-thumb
is that call centers over 300 seats are challenging to manage. Smaller
call centers are more economical in areas where there are many call
centers and labor availability is tight, since their Human resource
requirement is lower.
Indeed, availability and cost of Human resource is the greatest deferential,
rather than cheap real estate, when choosing a location for a call center.
Call centers need to be located within commuting distance in areas with
large pools of educated people. If multilingual call centers are planned,
they must be located in areas where people with appropriate skill sets
are available. Some call centers prefer to be located near colleges,
to facilitate employment of college students on a part-time basis.
In India, Gurgaon, virtually a suburb of Delhi, is the hot favorite
for call centers - some call it the call center capital of India. Chennai
(Madras), Mumbai (Bombay), and Ahmedbad are the other places where call
centers are coming up. These are the preferred locations for voice call
centers. For e-mail/web-based help desks, Bangalore and Pune are considered
good choices.
A report by Colliers Jardine cites two major considerations for locating
call centers in India - staff skills and costs. Other considerations
are the availability of space, stability of the State government, the
regulatory environment within each State, employee transport needs and
quality of telecom infrastructure.
According to the report, Mumbai and Delhi have the largest pools of
the required human resource. While Mumbai has an edge over Delhi in
work attitudes, it loses out to the Capital on manpower costs. Hyderabad
and Chennai have cost-effective manpower bases with the required language
and other skills.
Suburban business districts such as Bandra-Kurla and Andheri-Kurla in
Mumbai, Gurgaon near Delhi and Guindy in Chennai have become the hubs
of call center and other shared center activity in the respective States.
These SBDs offer rates that are comparatively lower than in the central
business districts, and also provide ample vehicle parking space. But
the downside in some cases is the need for employee transport.
In the area of regulatory environment and governance, Mumbai scored
higher than Delhi in administrative support and flexibility. Mumbai’s
focus on mega projects includes capital incentives and duty exemptions.
Chennai has a business-savvy State administration, leading to a high
share of foreign direct investment. The local administration in Hyderabad,
with its investor-friendly outlook and focus on service industry, has
overcome its disadvantages in physical infrastructure.
In terms of the quality of infrastructure available, Mumbai is the leader
in power, telecom and office infrastructure. Delhi’s infrastructure
having deteriorated over the last few years, companies prefer to relocate
to Gurgaon, which shares Delhi’s advantages but has a better infrastructure
backbone.
Hyderabad, with 14 Internet service providers, and Chennai with six,
are clearly leveraging information technology to overcome shortcomings
in infrastructure. The power situation in both States, according to
the Colliers Jardine survey, needs to be improved substantially.